Selection of an enzyme-linked immunoassay method to detect dioxin contamination in the environment
126 viewsDOI:
https://doi.org/10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.VITTEP.2022.100-106Keywords:
Competitive ELISA; Sandwich ELISA; Dioxin.Abstract
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is one of the methods being studied for screening for dioxin contamination because of the advantages of rapid, low cost and easy in-field implementation. The two methods of most interest are sandwich ELISA and indirect competitive ELISA with their own advantages. Therefore, it is necessary to study and investigate the dioxin detection ability of ELISA methods. This research initially evaluated the ability to detect dioxin of two ELISA methods with some commercially available anti-dioxin antibodies. The results showed that the anti-dioxin CABT-L4232 antibody had good binding ability to dioxins and hapten. Initially, the study showed that the indirect competitive ELISA method was capable of detecting dioxins at a concentration of 250 ppt, while the sandwich ELISA method was capable of detecting dioxins at a concentration of 1000 ppt in the analytical solution. Therefore, the indirect competitive ELISA method was chosen to continue to be optimal for dioxin analysis.
References
[1]. T. T. T. Quỳnh và cộng sự, “Nghiên cứu thăm dò phát hiện dioxin bằng phương pháp sandwich ELISA,” TC Nghiên cứu KHCNQS, tập 66, số 4, tr. 123-130, (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.66.2020.123-130
[2]. Văn phòng 701, Bộ Quốc phòng, Học Viện Quân y, “Kỷ yếu hội thảo quốc tế về khắc phục hậu quả của đất da cam/dioxin đối với con người và môi trường,” tr. 298, (2018).
[3]. K. S. Prashant, “Dioxin,” Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, 2nd edition (2019), pp. 125-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11832-9
[4]. G. Shan et al, “Highly sensitive dioxin immunoassay and its application to soid and biota sample,” J. Analytica Chimica Acta Vol. 444, pp. 169-178, (2001). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(01)01159-X
[5]. Y. Sugawara et al, “Development of a Highly Sensitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Based on Polyclonal Antibodies for the Detection of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins,” J. Analytical chemistry Vol. 70, pp. 1092-1099, (1998). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9708203
[6]. Y. Sugawara et al, “Improvement of the long-term stability for dioxin toxicity evaluation method by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,” J. Immunoassay and Immunochemistry, Vol. 31, pp. 111-119, (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15321811003617339
[7]. W. Tian et al, “Immunoanalysis methods for the detection of dioxins and related chemicals,” J. Sensors (Basel) Vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 16710-31, (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s121216710
[8]. United States Environmental Protection Agency, “Region II Method 1613B: CDDs/CDFs by isotope Dilution using HRGC/HRMS,” (2010).
[9]. R. A. Young, “Dioxins,” Encyclopedia of Toxicology, 3rd edition, Academic Press, pp. 190-194, (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386454-3.00374-2
[10]. M. Zhang et al, “Open burning as a source of dioxins,” J. Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 543-620, (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2017.1320154
[12]. https://www.usaid.gov/vi/vietnam/environmental-remediation-process.
