Assessment of the effect of hydraulic retention time on the efficiency of waste treatment by co-digestion combined anaerobic membrane bioreactor through different reactor types

107 views

Authors

  • Bui Hong Ha (Corresponding Author) Institute for Tropical Technology and Environmental Protection, Academy of Military Science and Technology
  • Nguyen Thanh Tri Institute for Tropical Technology and Environmental Protection, Academy of Military Science and Technology
  • Nguyen Thi Xuan Hong Institute for Tropical Technology and Environmental Protection, Academy of Military Science and Technology
  • Nguyen Phuoc Dan Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology
  • Nguyen Huynh Duc Nha Pham Ngoc Thach Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.VITTEP.2022.159-166

Keywords:

Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR); Anaerobic co-digestion; Organic solid waste; Domestic wastewater; Biogas production.

Abstract

This study evaluates the influence of hydraulic retention time on the efficiency of domestic waste treatment by co-digestion technology combined with anaerobic membrane bioreactor through different types of reactors: continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR-AnMBR) and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB-AnMBR). In the operating conditions of 2 models with average pH values ​​from 6.8 to 7.4, the temperature is in the Mesophilic range, and the mixing ratio of domestic wastewater and organic solid waste is 5g/L. Change the water retention time parameters including 72 hours, 48 ​​hours, 36 hours, and 24 hours, corresponding to organic loads: 0.67 kgCOD/m3.day, 1.00 kgCOD/m3.day, 1.33 kgCOD/m3.day and 2.00 kgCOD/m3.day. The results show that the COD treatment capacity at HRTs for the UASB-AnMBR model has a higher efficiency of 0.4% - 5.4%. In addition, the biogas production rate at the HRTs for the UASB-AnMBR model was higher than that of the CSTR-AnMBR model from 0.02 to 0.03 Lbiogas/gCODremoval. The corresponding methane generation rate is in the range of 0.01 - 0.02 Lbiogas/gCODremoval. The membrane transfer pressure value recorded in the experiment shows that the operating cycle of the membrane for the UASB tank is longer than 3.5 times than CSTR tank.

References

[1]. H. Yu, Z. Wang, Z. Wu and C. Zhu, "Enhanced waste activated sludge digestion using a submerged anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor: performance, sludge characteristics and microbial community," Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 20111, (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20111

[2]. G. Zeeman, K. Kujawa, T. d. Mes, L. Hernandez, M. d. Graaff, L. Abu-Ghunmi, A. Mels, B. Meulman, H. Temmink, C. B. J. v. Lier and G. Lettinga, "Anaerobic treatment as a core technology for energy, nutrients and water recovery from source-separated domestic waste(water)," Water Science & Technology, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1207-1212, (2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.101

[3]. S. Luostarinen and J. Rintala, "Anaerobic on-site treatment of kitchen waste in combination with black water in UASB-septic tanks at low temperatures," Bioresource Technology, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 1734-1740, (2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.022

[4]. J. W. Lim, "Anaerobic Co-digestion of Brown Water and Food Waste for Energy Recovery," in Urban waters: Resource or Risk? WWW-YES-2011, Arcueil, Prance, (2011).

[5]. Mengjiao Gao, Lei Zhang, Yang Liu, "High-loading food waste and blackwater anaerobic co-digestion: Maximizing bioenergy recovery," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 394, p. 124911, (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124911

[6]. Leitao, R. C, A. C van Haandel, G. Zeeman, G. Letting , "The effects of operation and environmental variations on anaerobic wastewater treatment systems: a review," Bioresource Technology , vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 1105-1118, (2006). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.007

[7]. Han, Y., R. R. Dague, "Laboratory studies on the temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of domestic primary sludge," Water Environmental Resources, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1139-1143, (1997). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/106143097X125885

[8]. Simon M. Wandera; Wei Qiao; Mengmeng Jiang; Dalal E. Gapani; Shaojie Bi; Renjie, "AnMBR as alternative to conventional CSTR to achieve efficient methane production from thermal hydrolyzed sludge at short HRTs," Energy, vol. 159, pp. 588-598, (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.201

[9]. M. Minale and T. Worku, "Anaerobic co-digestion of sanitary wastewater and kitchen solid waste for biogas and fertilizer production under ambient temperature: waste generated from condominium house," International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 509-516, (2014). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0255-7

[10]. R. Cheerawit, T. S. Thunwadee, K. Duangporn, R. Tanawat and K. Wichuda, "Biogas Production from Co-digestion of Domestic Wastewater and Foof Waste," Health and The Environment Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, (2012).

Published

20-12-2022

How to Cite

Bui, H. H., T. T. Nguyen, X. H. Nguyen Thi, P. D. Nguyen, and Đức N. Nguyen Huynh. “Assessment of the Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on the Efficiency of Waste Treatment by Co-Digestion Combined Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor through Different Reactor Types”. Journal of Military Science and Technology, no. VITTEP, Dec. 2022, pp. 159-66, doi:10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.VITTEP.2022.159-166.

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)