Prediction of surface roughness of Ti6Al4V and optimization of cutting parameters based on experimental design20 views
Keywords:Ti-6Al-4V alloy; Cutting parameters; Surface roughness; ANOVA.
The effect of machining parameters on the surface roughness in dry-turning Ti6Al4V alloy using an experimental design method was investigated. A mathematical equation based on the response surface methodology was established to fully understand the influence of machining parameters (cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut) on the surface roughness. A set of experiments based on a three-level statistical full factorial design of the experimental method was performed to collect the mean of surface roughness data. The model of R2=0.9656 shows a good correlation between the experimental results and predicted values. The analysis results from the model revealed that the feed rate is the dominant factor affecting surface roughness, followed by cutting speed, and depth of cut. The surface roughness was minimized when the feed rate and depth of cut are set to the lowest, and the cutting speed was set to the highest level. Verification of the experimental results indicated that the surface roughness of 0.832 µm at cutting speed of 200 m/min, feed rate of 0.1 mm/rev, and depth of cut of 0.1 mm were achieved under the optimal conditions
. R. B. Da Silva, Á. R. MacHado, E. O. Ezugwu, J. Bonney, and W. F. Sales, “Tool life and wear mechanisms in high speed machining of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with PCD tools under various coolant pressures,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 213, no. 8, pp. 1459–1464, (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.008
. A. Srivastava, A. Sharma, A. S. Gaur, R. Kumar, and Y. K. Modi, “Prediction of surface roughness for CNC turning of EN8 steel bar using artificial neural network model,” J. Eur. des Syst. Autom., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 185–188, (2019), doi: 10.18280/jesa.520211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.520211
. S. S. Mahapatra, “Parametric Analysis and Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Turning Operations based on Taguchi Method,” Proc. Int. Conf. Glob. Manuf. Innov., pp. 1–9, (2006).
. R. V. Rao and V. D. Kalyankar, “Optimization of modern machining processes using advanced optimization techniques: A review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 73, no. 5–8, pp. 1159–1188, (2014), doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-5894-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5894-4
. C. A. Van Luttervelt et al., “Present situation and future trends in modelling of machining operations progress report of the CIRP working group ’modelling of machining operations,” CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 587–626, (1998), doi: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63244-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63244-2
. N. R. Draper, “Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments,” J. Stat. Plan. Inference, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 185–186, (1997), doi: 10.1016/s0378-3758(97)81631-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(97)81631-X
. P. G. Benardos and G. C. Vosniakos, “Predicting surface roughness in machining: A review,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 833–844, (2003), doi: 10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00059-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00059-2
. S. Ghafari, H. A. Aziz, M. H. Isa, and A. A. Zinatizadeh, “Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation-flocculation treatment of leachate using poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 163, no. 2–3, pp. 650–656, (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.090
. M. R. Moola, A. Gorin, and K. A. Hossein, “Optimization of various cutting parameters on the surface roughness of the machinable glass ceramic with two flute square end mills of micro grain solid carbide,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1549–1554, (2012), doi: 10.1007/s12541-012-0204-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0204-2
. A. Aggarwal, H. Singh, P. Kumar, and M. Singh, “Optimizing power consumption for CNC turned parts using response surface methodology and Taguchi’s technique-A comparative analysis,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 200, no. 1–3, pp. 373–384, (2008), doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.041
. I. Korkut, M. Kasap, I. Ciftci, and U. Seker, “Determination of optimum cutting parameters during machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel,” Mater. Des., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 303–305, (2004), doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.011