ISO 4037 narrow spectrum X-ray reference field: Simulation and measurement
19 viewsDOI:
https://doi.org/10.54939/1859-1043.j.mst.94.2024.117-121Keywords:
Averaged energy; Air Kerma; SpekPy; Homogeneity coefficient.Abstract
The paper presents the characteristics of the ISO-4037 narrow spectrum X-ray reference fields in 02 different manners: simulation using the SpekPy and measurement using a calibrated ionization chamber. The physical (air Kerma rate) and radiation (X-ray fluence-spectrum-averaged energy, the first and the second half value layers, as well as the beam homogeneity coefficient) quantities were simulated using the SpekPy web-based simulation toolkit. In addition, air Kerma rates were measured by the ionization chamber. The characteristics of the ISO-4037 narrow spectrum X-ray reference fields were determined for various X-ray beam qualities (i.e., N-40, 60, 80, 100, 120, and 150) at 250 cm from the X-ray focal spot. The air Kerma rate tendency was deduced by comparing simulation and measurement data. The combined standard uncertainty of measured air Kerma rate was investigated and presented.
References
[1]. ISO 4037-1:2019; “X and gamma reference radiation for calibrating dosemeters and doserate meters and for determining their response as a function of photon energy - Part 1: Radiation characteristics and production methods”.
[2]. ISO 4037-2-2019; “X and gamma reference radiation for calibrating dosemeters and doserate meters and for determining their response as a function of photon energy - Part 2: Dosimetry for radiation protection over the energy ranges from 8 keV to 1.3 MeV and 4 MeV to 9 MeV”.
[3]. ISO 4037-3-2019; “X and gamma reference radiation for calibrating dosemeters and doserate meters and for determining their response as a function of photon energy - Part 3: Calibration of area and personal dosemeters and the measurement of their response as a function of energy and angle of incidence”
[4]. Zhang, D., Lai, W., Wu, J., Du, H., Zhao, R., Fan, S.; “Establishment of ISO 4037-1 X-ray narrow-spectrum series” The Journal of Engineering, 8858–8861, doi:10.1049/joe.2018.9126, (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2018.9126
[5]. Lee, S.K., Chang, I., Kim, S.I., Lee, J., Kim, H., Kim, J.L., Kim, M.C.; “Reference X-ray irradiation system for personal dosimeter testing and calibration of radiation detector” Journal of Radiation Protection and Research 44, 72–78, doi:10.14407/jrpr.2019.44.2.72, (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14407/jrpr.2019.44.2.72
[6]. Arectout, A., Zidouh, I., Sadeq, Y., Azougagh, M., Maroufi, B., Chakir, E., Boukhal, H.; “Calculation of X-ray spectra characteristics and Kerma to personal dose equivalent Hp(10) conversion coefficients: Experimental approach and Monte Carlo modeling”; Nuclear Engineering and Technology 54, (2022), 301–309, doi:10.1016/j.net.2021.07.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.07.028
[7]. Al-Tuweity, J., Sadiq, Y., Mouktafi, A., Arce, P., Fathi, I., Mohammed, M., Azougagh, M., Alibrahmi, E.M., Boukhal, H., Chakir, E.M.; “GAMOS/GEANT4 simulation and comparison study of X-ray narrow spectrum series at the national secondary standard dosimetry laboratory of Morocco”; Applied Radiation and Isotopes 175 (2021), 109789, doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109789
[8]. Herrati, A., Arib, M., Sidahmed, T., Khalal-Kouache, K.; “Establishment of ISO 4037-1 X-ray narrow-spectrum series at SSDL of Algiers”; Radiation Protection Dosimetry (2021), doi:10.1093/rpd/ncw093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw093
[9]. Pernicka, F., Andreo, P., A, M., Czap, L., Girzikowsky, R.; International Atomic Energy Agency (INIS-XA–176).
[10]. Siddiqua, T., Rahman, S., Sanaullah, Mitu, Z.A., Hossain, I., Rubai, S.S.; “Determination of calibration x-ray beam qualities and establish a set of conversion coefficient for calibration of radiation protection devices used in diagnostic radiology”; East European Journal of Physics, 55–61, (2021). doi:10.26565/2312-4334-2021-3-08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2021-3-08
[11]. Z ̌ivanovíc, M., Hupe, O., Zutz, H., S ̌abeta, A., Sandtner, S., Krz ̌anovíc, N.; “Euramet dosetrace supplementary comparison in terms of the ambient dose equivalent/rate for photon radiation (EURAMET.RI(I)-S18)”; Metrologia 60, 06017, (2023). doi:10.1088/0026-394/60/1A/06017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/60/1A/06017
[12]. IAEA. “Calibration of radiation protection monitoring instruments”. Safety Reports Series No. 16, (2000).
[13]. https://uncertainty.nist.gov/
[14]. Ankerhold, U., Hupe, O. “EURAMET supplementary comparison of the personal dose equivalent quantity for photon radiation: EURAMET.RI(i)-S5”. Metrologia 49, 06015. (2012). doi:10.1088/0026-1394/49/1A/06015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/49/1A/06015
